Should we stop adjectives the drinking close to we did smoking?

Should we stop adjectives the drinking close to we did smoking?
yes.
Drinking should only develop at home. Nowhere else.
No.
i stopped smoking.. when?
No. Why would we?
I think that should be up to the individual who is doing it. I am a smoker, and at first I didn't approaching the idea of not individual able to smoke indoors. But when I saw the proof of what old smoke does to those who don't smoke, I could eventually accept it. But WHAT would be the intention to CONTROL people's choice to drink if they are not driving? There wouldn't be any reson for it! If a person requests to drink, I think specifically their business.
Allow me to propose something with a twist--we first have need of to wean the public from the tax income which between smoking and alcohol is within the area of $50 billion a year. A constitutional amendment: "No height of government--national, state or local--shall use tax income from the consumption of addictive substances for any purpose save for treating the addiction and the health consequences of that addiction."
All tobacco products should enjoy the notice: "Tobacco is addictive. To quit hail as 1-800-XXX-XXXX." The cost should be covered by tobacco taxes.
All alcoholic products should have the interest: "If you can't stop drinking, call 1-800-XXX-XXXX." Again, the cost should be covered by the alcohol taxes.
If you can't support this, later it's time to roll back the anti-smoking law. Why should the general public benefit from a drug income if they aren't liable to share the health and esthetic consequences among themselves and their children? All that does is turn us into a nation of drug pushers.
pretty much