Should we bring subsidise DDT?

Was the dangers of DDT overly exaggerated or erroneous?
Thus exposing millions of society to malaria?
BTW...how many of you hear about this? (That danger of DDT are erroneous)Should we bring subsidise DDT?
I heard the claims too, but they are bogus. DDT is a highly contagious, long lasting toxin. So what if millions are exposed to malaria--should we destroy all of our mammals and insects to assistance people live contained by areas they should never live in? We also enjoy drugs to treat malaria, so make more drugs. DDT breaks down so slowly it moves through the food chain--all the path to the major predators and into humans. I'd help yourself to the malaria over the increases in cancer and other diseases resulting from DDT breaking down surrounded by my body.
NO DON'T BRING IT BACK
Venom,NO DDT causes birth defect in children